Composition and process for cleaning and disinfecting food products

ABSTRACT

A composition and process for improving the quality of raw food product such as seafood, meat and fowl including a treatment of a bath, rinse, ice blend, steam or spray for preparing the raw food product, such as fresh fish, meat or poultry or produce. Before the treatment is used, the raw product is cleaned in a conventional manner. The treatment composition is intended to clean, deodorize, and disinfect the raw food product. The present invention removes slime and odor from fresh fish in preparation for cooking, and further, disinfects the fish and other food product to be cooked in the event that harmful bacteria or other microbes reside on the raw fish, such as harmful microorganisms which may be a residue of polluted water from which the fish was taken, or may have originated from filthy food preparation facilities.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The instant invention relates to a composition and process for cleaning and disinfecting food products, such as a fish or other seafood products. The composition and process is also useful for meat products, including hamburger beef, sausage, hot dogs and poultry. In particular, it relates to exposing the product to the composition, such as by grinding ice blends, smokehouse rinse cycles, steam skinning, topical application by spraying the product or immersing the product in a treatment bath of lemon juice, lime juice, salt, vinegar, turmeric powder and water for killing bacteria and loosening scaly or rough surfaces, while maintaining a pleasant organoleptic taste for the consumer of the product. The composition and process cleans a product, such as a scaled fish of oily film and tissues while at the same time maintaining the taste and textural consistency of the fish or other meat product. Furthermore, the composition and process can be used to sanitize food preparation surfaces and equipment in restaurant and home kitchens. In agriculture, the composition and process can be used for a feed spray to sanitize livestock feed materials and can be used as a livestock wash for the eyes and mouth of livestock, such as cattle or sheep.

BACKGROUND OF THE RELATED ART

[0002] The past few years have been especially tough on the food industry. Recalls have damaged many brands and entire companies and put in question the public's confidence in the wholesomeness of foods in general. Since the tragedy of Sep. 11, 2001, there is a heightened alert for the dangers of contaminated food. Product recalls may have a catastrophic effect like never before. Since Sep. 11, 2001, the public react differently to the dangers of food contamination and the media is on heightened alert. The risk factors for a food related industry with such an event has gone from possible costly product recalls to certain economic devastation.

[0003] Although several substances are known in the art for treating and scaling the surfaces of different fish, removing such surfaces of scales and oil subcutaneous films, no commercial composition or process is known or suggested which permits the cleaning and disinfecting of a fish without causing the treated fish to shrivel up and assume a “pickled” texture, while a disinfecting of bacteria from the fish. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,706,333 to Ammerman, a process is described for cleaning fish in a caustic bath, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,951,155 to Pack a process is described for descaling fish by immersing the fish in an aqueous bath of vinegar and water. Such processes, however, unlike the present composition and process, damage the inherent textural consistency of the fish fillet meat, and leave an acidic odor.

[0004] Other prior art patents include U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,957 of Kingsley and U.S. Pat. No. 2,383,907 of Beechem, as well as United Kingdom Patent No. 18,345 of Danilevsky. Kingsley concerns use of citric acid for odor treatment and Danilevsky uses acetic acid to preserve fish. Beechem claims to describe acids to kill bacteria, but cites as an example 10% nitric acid to clean hard shelled beans.

OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

[0005] It is therefore an object of the present invention to clean and disinfect edible food products, such as fish or meat, while maintaining a pleasant organoleptic taste for the consumer of the product.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0006] In accordance with the present invention there is provided an aqueous composition which is suitable for treating by immersion a meat product, such as an uncooked fish therein, whether fresh or thawed from a frozen state, to remove a variety of undesirable filmy substances and subcutaneous debris while retaining a fresh odor to the fish for cooking and maintaining the textural consistency and appearance of the fish fillet materials.

[0007] The composition and process may also be used on meats, such as pork, beef or poultry, or other types of seafood, such as lobster, shrimp and shellfish, whether fresh or thawed from a frozen state.

[0008] Among the materials used in the composition of the invention in which the food product may be immersed, the following may be mentioned, without implying any limitation, namely, water, 5% white vinegar solution (acetic acid), lemon juice, lime juice, salt and turmeric.

[0009] For example, oily films and subcutaneous debris on the surface of a fish may be easily cleaned by treatment with the composition of the invention since, as the fish is immersed for a period of time, generally 5-7 minutes, these undesirable substances are removed in the aqueous solution, thus avoiding in consequence the final step of cleaning these substances with knives. It is to be understood that the treatment composition of the invention may be applied to previously scaled fish fillets. The composition thus obtains a clean fish fillet which is also highly disinfected of bacteria, thus increasing its desirability for cooking.

[0010] A laboratory conducted a bacterial analysis and count on raw fresh fish prepared and treated in the manner of the present invention both before and after the application of the fish cleaning bath confirms the bacterial disinfecting efficacy of the composition and process of the present invention. It is also found that the treatment composition and process of the invention inhibits and/or reduces growth of bacterial infection on raw foods such as beef, pork, fowl, and the like.

[0011] The composition and process cleans and disinfects food products, such as a fish or other seafood products. The composition and process is also useful for meat products, including hamburger beef, sausage, hot dogs and poultry. In particular, it relates to exposing the product to the composition, such as by grinding ice blends, smokehouse rinse cycles, steam skinning, topical application by spraying the product or immersing the product in a treatment bath of lemon juice, lime juice, salt, vinegar, turmeric powder and water for killing bacteria and loosening scaly or rough surfaces, while maintaining a pleasant organoleptic taste for the consumer of the product. The composition and process cleans a product, such as a scaled fish of oily film and tissues while at the same time maintaining the taste and textural consistency of the fish or other meat product. Furthermore, the composition and process can be used to sanitize food preparation surfaces and equipment in restaurant and home kitchens. In agriculture, the composition and process can be used for a feed spray to sanitize livestock feed materials and can be used as a livestock wash for an orifice, such as the eyes and mouth of livestock, such as cattle or sheep. Moreover, the composition can be applied to displayed produce, by spraying or surface rinse for freshness and extended shelf life.

[0012] The composition and process of the present invention removes subcutaneous slime and odor from fresh fish or meat in preparation for cooking, and further, disinfects the fish or meat to be cooked in the event that harmful bacterial or other microorganisms reside on the raw fish or meat. Such harmful microorganism may be a residue of polluted water from which the fish was taken, or may have originated from filthy food preparation facilities of either fish or meat products.

[0013] Raw fresh fish normally has an odor which can be removed by the use of the fish cleaning composition of the invention. Such fish odors emanate from the proteins and oils inherent in raw fresh fish. The combined lemon juice and lime juice of the resent composition, together with the 5% vinegar solution and turmeric have a unique ability to remove the normal “fishy” odor of raw fresh fish, and replace that odor with a slight citrus odor which masks an acidic, vinegary odor which emanates if just vinegar is used as in Pack '355. The slight citrus odor is the result of combined lemon and lime scents from the natural fruit juices used in the invention. This citrus odor adds to the flavor and appeal of the fish both before and after cooking.

[0014] The fish cleaning bath also has the effect of removing the natural slime coating inherently found in or upon most raw fresh fish after descaling. The result of using the fish cleaning bath of the invention on raw fish is that after such treatment, the fish has a non-slippery feel, and is thus fare more appealing to a consumer who purchases and prepares the fish for consumption.

[0015] The present invention further kills or removes pathogenic bacteria which may be upon the surface of raw fresh fish before cooking. Such bacteria may originate in polluted water from which the fish was taken, or from unclean food preparation surfaces with which the raw fish comes in contact during preparation for cooking.

[0016] This disinfecting aspect of the present invention is confirmed in laboratory testing.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0017] The present invention is both a treatment composition, which is a combination of ingredients, and a process, which is the cleaning, de-sliming, disinfection and deodorizing of raw fish to be cooked by using the treatment composition of the invention in a fish cleaning bath.

[0018] Alternatively, the treatment composition and process may be used for other raw meat products, such as beef, pork, poultry and other types of seafood, such as crustaceans and shellfish.

[0019] A typical preferred embodiment of the treatment composition contains the following proportion of ingredients: Water 0.5 Gallons 64 fluid ounces 50% 5% White Vinegar Solution 10 fluid ounces  8% Lemon Juice 27 fluid ounces 21% Lime Juice 27 fluid ounces 21% Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces 100%  1.0 Gallon

[0020] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients in the following preferable amounts: 3 Teaspoons Table Salt 3 Teaspoons Tumeric

[0021] The fish cleaning bath is used in the following manner. First, a raw fresh fish is cleaned and eviscerated and its scales, if any, are removed by hand or by machine. The raw fish is then immersed in the fish cleaning bath for 4-8 minutes, preferably 5-7 minutes, depending on the acid concentration of the treatment composition. If exceeding 7 to 10 minutes immersion at the above identified concentration, the fish cleaning bath may begin to decompose the flesh of the raw fish, giving an unacceptable result in which the fish flesh breaks apart easily, which is what was observed when fish were immersed in the Pack '355 solution of vinegar and water.

[0022] After the raw fresh fish has been immersed for 4-8 minutes, preferably 5-7 minutes, the fish cleaning bath, with the raw fresh fish therein, is vigorously agitated, either mechanically or by hand for 30-45 seconds. Agitation mechanically removes gross filth or soil which may be lodged upon the surface of the raw fish. When the vigorous agitation is complete, the raw fresh fish is removed from the fish cleaning bath and is thoroughly rinsed in cold water, after which the fish is ready for further preparation or for immediate cooking. The total time in which the fish is immersed in the bath is 4-8 minutes, preferably 5-7 minutes soaking time and an additional 30-4 seconds during which there is vigorous mechanical agitation. When the aforementioned concentrations are used, the raw fresh fish should not be exposed to the fish cleaning bath for more than 8 minutes. However, if lower concentrations of the components are used, then the immersion time may be 12 minutes.

[0023] After being rinsed, the fish flesh is firm, has either no odor at all or a slight citrus odor, has no slippery feel, and is substantially free from pathogenic bacteria which originated either in the water from which the fish was taken or from unclean food preparation surfaces.

[0024] Therefore, the present invention is a combination of ingredients and proportions thereof comprising a treatment composition and treatment process for preparing raw fresh fish for cooking. Before the composition of the present invention is used, the raw fresh fish is scaled and cleaned in a conventional manner. Such conventional cleaning involves eviscerating the fish, optionally removing the head, and removing any scales by conventional means.

[0025] The treatment of the present invention is intended to clean, deodorize, and disinfect the raw fresh fish after conventional cleaning and before cooking.

[0026] The solid ingredients admixed with the above mixture may be varied as follows: Amount: Preferably: Ingredient: 1-5 teaspoons 5 tsp/gallon Table Salt 1-5 teaspoons 2 tsp/gallon Tumeric

[0027] The above composition may be used in accordance with the practice of the invention with a time, but immersion time is shorter, up to 6 minutes maximum.

[0028] The original composition may be also used in the treatment process with a time variation but immersion time is shorter, such as up to 4 minutes maximum.

[0029] In alternate embodiments of the aforementioned preferred composition, the following variants of proportional ingredients are presented as also being suitable.

[0030] The proportions of ingredients in the composition may be varied as noted below designated as Variant 1, wherein somewhat less water is used with an increased amount of vinegar. Water 40 fluid ounces 31% 5% White Vinegar Solution 34 fluid ounces 27% Lemon Juice 27 fluid ounces 27% Lime Juice 27 fluid ounces 21% Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces 100%  1.0 Gallon

[0031] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients: 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0032] The immersion time suitable for use in the treatment process hereinabove described is substantially the same as previously reported, i.e. from about 4 minutes to 8 minutes maximum immersion plus the time for vigorous agitation.

[0033] Another variation of the composition, including more water, a lower concentration of vinegar wherein the immersion time remains 8 minutes maximum is summarized below. Water 69 fluid ounces 54% 5% White Vinegar Solution 5 fluid ounces  4% Lemon Juice 27 fluid ounces 21% Lime Juice 27 fluid ounces 21% Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces 100%  1.0 Gallon

[0034] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients: 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0035] Preferably, the solid ingredients are in the following amounts: 3 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 3 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0036] The immersion time suitable for use in the treatment process with the above composition is substantially the same, i.e. from about 4 minutes to 9 minutes maximum immersion plus the time for vigorous agitation.

[0037] In another variant, as summarized below, there is less water, same vinegar, more citrus juice and the immersion time remains 8 minutes maximum. Water 40 fluid ounces 32% 5% White Vinegar Solution 10 fluid ounces  8% Lemon Juice 39 fluid ounces 30% Lime Juice 39 fluid ounces 30% Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces 100%  1.0 Gallon

[0038] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients: 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0039] Preferably, the solid ingredients are in the following amounts: 3 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 3 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0040] Suitable immersion times with this variant of the composition of the invention is similar to that used with the previously reported compositions, i.e. from about 4 minutes to 8 minutes maximum immersion plus the time for vigorous agitation.

[0041] In a further variation, designated as composition Variant 4, the composition is prepared with more water, same vinegar, with less citrus and the immersion time remains 8 minutes maximum. Water 84 fluid ounces 32% 5% White Vinegar Solution 10 fluid ounces  8% Lemon Juice 17 fluid ounces 30% Lime Juice 17 fluid ounces 30% Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces 100%  1.0 Gallon

[0042] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients: 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0043] Preferably, the solid ingredients are in the following amounts: 3 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 3 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0044] In a still further variation, there is a change in lemon juice/lime juice proportions. Water, vinegar are the same as in composition variants 1-4 above, but the immersion time remains 8 minutes maximum.

[0045] To summarize, the ingredient ranges of the original composition and variations 1-4, there is provided the following desirable ranges: Water 40-84 fluid ounces 32-66% 5% White Vinegar Solution 5-34 fluid ounces  4-27% Lemon Juice 17-39 fluid ounces 14-31% Lime Juice 17-39 fluid ounces 14-31% Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces  100% 1.0 Gallon

[0046] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients: 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 1-5 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric Lemon Juice:Lime Juice ratio is 2:1

[0047] Another embodiment of the composition of the present invention is according to the following formula: amt/1000 ml amt/gal amt/gal Ingredient SS SS 8 fold Conc Lemon juice (1 + 7) 26.4 ml 100.0 ml 800.0 Lime juice (1 + 6.5) 26.4 ml 100.0 ml 800.0 White Vinegar, 15% 26.4 ml 100.0 ml 266.7 Salt 4.0 gm 15 gm 120.0 Tumeric 2.6 ml 10 ml 1718.3 Total 1000.0 ml 3785.0 ml 3785.0

[0048] Tumeric Extract is from Heavenly Flavors of Suffern, N.Y.

[0049] According to the above formula, lemon juice concentrate can be used, as long as it is mixed with seven parts water. The same is true with lime juice concentrate, as long as it is mixed with 6.5 parts water.

[0050] In this formula, the preferred concentration of both lemon and lime juice, each including lemon or lime juice concentrate and water as noted above, is about 20 percent each for lemon and lime juice, and the percentage of vinegar is about 7 percent.

[0051] In other applications in addition for fish preparation, the present invention is useful in applications such as ice blend exposures for hamburger and other chopped or ground meat in grinding machines, where the chopped or ground meat is exposed to ice. In the present invention, the composition can be frozen and mixed with the ice blend contacting the meat being ground.

[0052] The composition can also be used for preparing sausage in the sausage cooking/rinse cycle of a meat smokehouse.

[0053] In preparation of tubular frankfurter hot dogs, the composition can be applied in the steam-exposed skinning and skin removal phases of the production of the tubular product at 160 degree F., where the skin is blown off of the tubular meat product.

[0054] The product can also be topically applied to fresh meat, processed meat, chicken and seafood by brushing, spraying or rinsing.

[0055] The composition can also be sprayed or brushed upon food preparation equipment in restaurants or home kitchens, such as meat slicers, and food preparation surfaces, such as wooden or plastic cutting boards, for sanitation thereof.

[0056] For displayed produce, the composition can be applied by spraying or surface rinse for freshness and extended shelf life.

[0057] In agriculture, the composition and process can be used for a feed spray to sanitize livestock feed materials and can be used as a livestock wash for the eyes and mouth of livestock, such as cattle or sheep.

[0058] The suggested usage rate for Composition of the present invention is as follows:

[0059] a) For cut red meats (beef, pork, lamb):

[0060] For the average size piece in weight range up to 6 ounces-1 ounce (2 tbsp).

[0061] For the larger size pieces use 1 ounce for every 4 ounces.

[0062] b) For chicken

[0063] For every ½ pound use 1½ ounce (3 TBSP).

[0064] The composition of the present invention should be applied to the outside surface of the meat, except for hamburger or ground meats where it is applied in an ice blend contacting the granules of meat being ground.

[0065] For non-ground meat, such as steaks, fillets, breasts, etc., it should be worked into the surface with a moderately stiff brush making sure that the surface has been completely covered. It should be left in place a minimum of 5 minutes before being rinsed off.

TESTING EXAMPLES

[0066] The evaluation of disinfecting characteristics of the composition and treatment process of the invention is illustrated by the following specific examples which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope therein.

[0067] The following tests of a combination of ingredients and proportions thereof comprising a treatment composition and a process for preparing raw fresh fish for cooking were conducted under laboratory conditions. Before the treatment composition of the present invention is used, samples of raw fresh fish are cleaned in a conventional manner. Such cleaning involves eviscerating the fish, optionally removing the head, and removing any scales by conventional means. The treatment composition of the present invention is intended to be used in accordance with the practice of the invention to clean, deodorize, and disinfect the raw fresh fish after conventional cleaning and before cooking.

[0068] The objects of the present invention are to remove slime and odor from fresh fish in preparation for cooking, and further, to disinfect the fish to be cooked in the event that harmful bacteria or other microorganisms reside on the raw fish. Such harmful microorganisms may be a residue of polluted water from which the fish is taken, or may have originated from filthy food preparation facilities.

Example 1

[0069] In order to demonstrate that the treatment composition and process of the invention kills or removes pathogenic bacteria which may be upon the surface of raw fresh fish, laboratory testing is conducted. The following is a report of the procedures, tests and results. A bacteria count on raw fresh fish is conducted by means of standard plate counts.

[0070] Six different kinds of fresh fish are purchased at a fish market. Cutting utensils and cutting surfaces are cleaned, and each of the six kinds of fish are cut into two pieces, with one piece of each kind of fish being placed in a clean sample bag without any treatment. The other piece of each of the six kinds of fish (the test sample) is immersed in a treatment bath containing the following ingredients and proportions thereof: Water 64 fluid ounces 5% White Vinegar Solution 10 fluid ounces Lemon Juice 27 fluid ounces Lime Juice 27 fluid ounces Total Liquid Volume per batch 128 fluid ounces 100% 1.0 Gallon

[0071] Admixed in the above Mixture are the following solid ingredients: 3 teaspoons per gallon Table Salt 3 teaspoons per gallon Tumeric

[0072] Each test sample of fish is immersed in the treatment bath for 5 minutes and vigorously agitated for 30 seconds after which the sample is washed in cold water.

[0073] After this five-minute immersion and washing, each of the six test simples was separately placed into a clean plastic sample bag. There were thus 12 samples taken to the laboratory—control (untreated) pieces of fish and 6 experimental (treated) pieces of fish, all raw, and all purchased approximately 15 minutes before the preparation of the samples.

[0074] The control and experimental samples were transported to the laboratory immediately after the samples were prepared, and were ready for testing and one half hours after having been purchased at a fish market.

[0075] The fish samples comprised the following different kinds of fish: Test Sample Control Sample (5 Minute Immersion in the (No Treatment) inventive composition) 1. Red Snapper 7. Red Snapper 2. Blue Fish 8. Blue Fish 3. Whiting 9. Whiting 4. Grouper 10. Grouper 5. Salmon 11. Salmon 6. Scrod 12. Scrod

[0076] Samples 1 and 7, are prepared by cutting a single Red Snapper into two equivalent-sized pieces. One being the control (Sample 1) and the other being the experiment (Sample 7). In this manner, whatever bacteria may have been present upon the purchased sample of Red Snapper is determined because the control sample was submitted to the laboratory without treatment. The only difference between sample 1 and sample 7 was the treatment given to sample 7 as described above. Thus, the effects of bacteria reduction can only be attributed to treatment with the present invention. The remaining samples are prepared in an identical fashion.

[0077] A Standard Plate Count procedure is used to determine the presence of bacteria upon each of the samples. The results obtained are summarized below:

[0078] The bacteria count showed a dramatic decrease for 5 of the 6 fish samples treated with the composition of the present invention. In one of the fish samples there was a significant decrease in the bacteria count of the treated fish sample, but the decrease was not dramatic.

[0079] Specifically, the results from the standard bacteria plate counts reported by Ameritech Laboratories were as follows: TABLE 1 RESULTS Bacteria Test Sample Bacteria Control Sample Per [5 Min Immersion] Per [No treatment] Gram in Present Invention Gram 1. Red Snapper 2480  7. Red Snapper 496 2. Blue Fish 12400  8. Blue Fish 11160 3. Whiting 8060  9. Whiting 1550 4. Grouper 89280 10. Grouper 49600 5. Salmon 161200 11. Salmon 7440 6. Scrod 86800 12. Scrod 6200

Example 2

[0080] This example illustrates disinfecting raw fresh food products using the composition and process of the present invention.

[0081] A treatment composition prepared with the proportion of ingredients described in Example 1 is used in this Example.

[0082] The pH of Example 2 is determined to be 2.58.

[0083] Samples of five different food products (meat, fish and fowl) are purchased. Cutting utensils and surfaces are cleaned, and each of the four kinds of food (ground beef, sliced steak, pork and chicken) are cut into two pieces, with one piece of each type of food products being placed in a clean sample bag without any treatment. The other piece of each of five kinds of sample food precuts is immersed in a treatment bath (prepared as described in Example 1) using the treatment procedure described in Example 1 (5 minute immersion including 30 second vigorous agitation). Each of the test samples are washed in water and separately placed in clean plastic sample bags.

[0084] The control and experimental samples of food products are transported for laboratory testing which started within 2 hours after purchase of the food products, a Standard Plate Count bacteria analysis presence of bacteria.

[0085] The results were as follows for standard plate count of bacteria: TABLE 2 RESULTS Percent Examination of: Untreated Treated Reduction Hamburger 3348000  7300 99.78 Sliced Steak  744000  2600 99.65 Pork 4464000 12000 99.73 Chicken 6820000 13100 98.92 Fish 2790000 30000 98.92

Example 3

[0086] As shown in Table 3 herein, a test was conducted at Ameritech Laboratories in College Point, N.Y. to test the efficacy of the composition and process of the present invention in treating hot dog frankfurters.

[0087] The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the composition of the present invention as an agent to control the growth of microorganisms on packaged hotdogs.

[0088] Locally purchased hotdogs were used for this study. All test items were examined for freshness. Immediately prior to application of the bacterial culture, each hotdog was immersed in boiling water for 10 seconds followed by cooling for a minimum of 2 minutes before the application of the bacteria culture.

[0089] Stock cultures of the following bacteria were prepared: E. Coli, Salmonella-typhimurium, Listeria Monocytogenes, Staphylococcus Aureus and Clostridium Perfringins. These cultures were prepared so as to have approximately 10 million bacteria per milliliter. For application the cultures were diluted by a factor of 5, 50 and 500.

[0090] The 2 milliliters of each culture was applied to the surface of the hotdog, covering as much of the surface as possible. The culture was spread evenly and allowed to dry for 4 hours. At the end of four hours, the hotdogs were coated with the composition of the present invention by spraying so as to be completely covered. The sprayed hotdogs were placed in sterile plastic bags, three to a bag. Control groups of, each culture were also prepared. The bags with the Clostridium cultures were vacuum-sealed, all others were closed with only a small amount of air remaining. After closing, the bags were placed in a refrigerator at 40 degrees F. until removed for analysis.

[0091] Prior to analysis, the bags were removed from the refrigerator and allowed to come to room temperature. The hot dogs were then rinsed under a stream of cool water to remove the coating composition. No scrubbing was applied. The hot dogs were then placed in 100 ml of sterile buffer prior to plating the buffer. The rinsing procedure was applied to the samples run on day 0 which were not refrigerated. TABLE 3 Results: E. Coli Salmon. Listeria Staph. Clostrid. Day 0 High Level Control 1 2,760,000 1,300,000 2,760,000 867,000 907,000 2 1,950,000 1,420,000 1,140,000 765,000 973,000 3 2,320,000 1,160,000 2,250,000 843,000 892,000 avg 2,343,333 1,293,333 2,050,000 825,000 924,000 Composition of the present invention 1 37600 8560 59200 13100 32000 2 41600 7150 53200 11700 25200 3 34100 7320 51400 11900 31000 avg 37767 7677 54600 12233 29400 avg % 98.39 99.41 97.34 98.52 96.82 reduction Day 0 Low Level Control 1 24,100 12,700 36,200 10,700 12,100 2 20,300 15,200 28,400 11,400 10,600 3 18,300 14,700 31,000 10,100 10,200 avg 20,900 14,200 31,867 10,733 10,967 Composition of the present invention 1 126 530 592 131 320 2 328 450 532 117 252 3 276 662 514 119 310 avg 243 547 546 122 294 avg % 98.84 96.15 98.29 98.86 97.32 reduction Day 1 High Level Control 1 2,150,000 1,370,000 2,840,000 875,000 657,000 2 2,310,000 1,290,000 2,720,000 732,000 542,000 3 1,820,000 1,520,000 2,430,000 804,000 743,000 avg 2,093,333 1,393,333 2,663,333 803,667 647,333 Composition of the present invention 1 29500 5780 50400 15200 22500 2 34200 6320 62500 18300 26900 3 25100 7070 50300 12600 19400 avg 29600 6390 54400 15367 22933 avg % 98.59 99.54 97.96 98.09 96.46 reduction Day 1 Low Level Control 1 18,300 13,500 33,700 11,800 9,600 2 19,700 14,700 32,900 12,600 7,200 3 16,200 15,900 27,600 9,500 10,400 avg 18,067 14,700 31,400 11,300 9,067 Composition of the present invention 1 333 576 322 108 156 2 249 423 572 85 182 3 385 486 287 128 295 avg 322 495 394 107 211 avg % 98.22 96.63 98.75 99.05 97.67 reduction Day 2 High Level Control 1 2,830,000 1,720,000 2,790,000 1,020,000 594,000 2 3,140,000 1,420,000 3,040,000 970,000 627,000 3 2,350,000 1,960,000 2,560,000 1,110,000 757,000 avg 2,73,333 1,700,000 2,796,667 1,033,333 659,333 Composition of the present invention 1 25600 15600 43200 23100 11800 2 22000 17400 50200 19300 15600 3 27200 18200 51500 20700 18200 avg 24933 17067 48300 21033 15200 avg % 99.10 99.00 98.27 97.96 97.69 reduction Day 2 Low Level Control 1 16,100 15,600 28,200 14,700 7,200 2 18,800 18,300 31,600 13,300 9,400 3 15,600 14,700 27,200 16,200 8,800 avg 16,833 16,200 29,000 14,733 8,467 Composition of the present invention 1 293 486 336 87 122 2 268 527 295 152 176 3 367 445 313 98 198 avg 309 486 315 112 165 avg % 98.16 97.00 98.91 99.24 98.05 reduction Day 4 High Level Control 1 3,950,000 1,820,000 2,790,000 1,010,000 702,000 2 3,320,000 2,230,000 3,130,000 1,050,000 657,000 3 2,760,000 2,470,000 2,980,000 1,080,000 602,000 avg 3,343,333 2,173,333 2,966,667 1,046,667 653,667 Composition of the present invention 1 20800 18800 44700 28000 14100 2 22900 15600 38900 17200 10400 3 23500 12700 40300 13100 6500 avg 22400 15700 41300 19433 10333 avg % 99.33 99.28 98.61 98.14 98.42 reduction Day 4 Low Level Control 1 21,300 18,900 26,000 19,400 10,400 2 20,700 13,800 29,600 20,300 8,300 3 18,200 17,200 36,100 22,600 7,800 avg 20,067 16,633 30,567 20,767 8,833 Composition of the present invention 1 156 336 170 101 113 2 453 367 226 75 124 3 245 408 256 83 206 avg 285 370 217 86 148 avg % 98.58 97.77 99.29 99.58 98.33 reduction Day 7 High Level Control 1 5,640,000 2,070,000 2,990,000 1,420,000 814,000 2 4,360,000 3,210,000 4,720,000 1,250,000 727,000 3 5,250,000 2,670,000 4,230,000 1,320,000 733,000 avg 5,083,333 2,650,000 3,980,000 1,330,000 758,000 Composition of the present invention 1 34600 12700 33500 13700 10600 2 18200 14300 42600 22400 9600 3 24300 14800 32100 20600 12500 avg 25700 13933 36067 18900 10900 avg % 99.49 99.47 99.09 98.58 98.56 reduction Day 7 Low Level Control 1 34,800 22,100 45,600 28,300 7,100 2 38,200 17,800 38,000 16,500 11,400 3 23,200 21,700 42,000 25,700 9,200 avg 32,067 20,533 41,867 23,500 9,233 Composition of the present invention 1 220 550 143 156 92 2 180 360 192 62 180 3 300 290 243 112 240 avg 233 400 193 110 171 avg % 99.27 98.05 99.54 99.53 98.15 reduction Day 0 High Level Control 1 2,760,000 1,300,000 2,760,000 867,000 907,000 2 1,950,000 1,420,000 1,140,000 765,000 973,000 3 2,320,000 1,160,000 2,250,000 843,000 892,000 avg 2,343,333 1,293,333 2,050,000 825,000 924,000 Composition of the present invention 1 37600 8560 59200 13100 32000 2 41600 7150 53200 11700 25200 3 34100 7320 51400 11900 31000 avg 37767 7677 54600 12233 29400 avg % 98.39 99.41 97.34 98.52 96.82 reduction Day 0 Low Level Control 1 24,100 12,700 36,200 10,700 12,100 2 20,300 15,200 28,400 11,400 10,600 3 18,300 14,700 31,000 10,100 10,200 avg 20,900 14,200 31,867 10,733 10,967 Composition of the present invention 1 126 530 592 131 320 2 328 450 532 117 252 3 276 662 514 119 310 avg 243 547 546 122 294 avg % 98.84 96.15 98.29 98.86 97.32 reduction Day 1 High Level Control 1 2,150,000 1,370,000 2,840,000 875,000 657,000 2 2,310,000 1,290,000 2,720,000 732,000 542,000 3 1,820,000 1,520,000 2,430,000 804,000 743,000 avg 2,093,333 1,393,333 2,663,333 803,667 647,333 Composition of the present invention 1 29500 5780 50400 15200 22500 2 34200 6320 62500 18300 26900 3 25100 7070 50300 12600 19400 avg 29600 6390 54400 15367 22933 avg % 98.59 99.54 97.96 98.09 96.46 reduction Day 1 Low Level Control 1 18,300 13,500 33,700 11,800 9,600 2 19,700 14,700 32,900 12,600 7,200 3 16,200 15,900 27,600 9,500 10,400 avg 18,067 14,700 31,400 11,300 9,067 Composition of the present invention 1 333 576 322 108 156 2 249 423 572 85 182 3 385 486 287 128 295 avg 322 495 394 107 211 avg % 98.22 96.63 98.75 99.05 97.67 reduction Day 2 High Level Control 1 2,830,000 1,720,000 2,790,000 1,020,000 594,000 2 3,140,000 1,420,000 3,040,000 970,000 627,000 3 2,350,000 1,960,000 2,560,000 1,110,000 757,000 avg 2,773,333 1,700,000 2,796,667 1,033,333 659,333 Composition of the present invention 1 25600 15600 43200 23100 11800 2 22000 17400 50200 19300 15600 3 27200 18200 51500 20700 18200 avg 24933 17067 48300 21033 15200 avg % 99.10 99.00 98.27 97.96 97.69 reduction Day 2 Low Level Control 1 16,100 15,600 28,200 14,700 7,200 2 18,800 18,300 31,600 13,300 9,400 3 15,600 14,700 27,200 16,200 8,800 avg 16,833 16,200 29,000 14,733 8,467 Composition of the present invention 1 293 486 336 87 122 2 268 527 295 152 176 3 367 445 313 98 198 avg 309 486 315 112 165 avg % 98.16 97.00 98.91 99.24 98.05 reduction Day 4 High Level Control 1 3,950,000 1,820,000 2,790,000 1,010,000 702,000 2 3,320,000 2,230,000 3,130,000 1,050,000 657,000 3 2,760,000 2,470,000 2,980,000 1,080,000 602,000 avg 3,343,333 2,173,333 2,966,667 1,046,667 653,667 Composition of the present invention 1 20800 18800 44700 28000 14100 2 22900 15600 38900 17200 10400 3 23500 12700 40300 13100 6500 avg 22400 15700 41300 19433 10333 avg % 99.33 99.28 98.61 98.14 98.42 reduction Day 4 Low Level Control 1 21,300 18,900 26,000 19,400 10,400 2 20,700 13,800 29,600 20,300 8,300 3 18,200 17,200 36,100 22,600 7,800 avg 20,067 16,633 30,567 20.767 8,833 Composition of the present invention 1 156 336 170 101 113 2 453 367 226 75 124 3 245 408 256 83 206 avg 285 370 217 86 148 avg % 98.58 97.77 99.29 99.58 98.33 reduction Day 7 High Level Control 1 5,640,000 2,070,000 2,990,000 1,420,000 814,000 2 4,360,000 3,210,000 4,720,000 1,250,000 727,000 3 5,250,000 2,670,000 4,230,000 1,320,000 733,000 avg 5,083,333 2,650,000 3,980,000 1,330,000 758,000 Composition of the present invention 1 34600 12700 33500 13700 10600 2 18200 14300 42600 22400 9600 3 24300 14800 32100 20600 12500 avg 25700 13933 36067 18900 10900 avg % 99.49 99.47 99.09 98.58 98.56 reduction Day 7 Low Level Control 1 34,800 22,100 45,600 28,300 7,100 2 38,200 17,800 38,000 16,500 11,400 3 23,200 21,700 42,000 25,700 9,200 avg 32,067 20,533 41,867 23,500 9,233 Composition of the present invention 1 220 550 143 156 92 2 180 360 192 62 180 3 300 290 243 112 240 avg 233 400 193 110 171 avg % 99.27 98.05 99.54 99.53 98.15 reduction Day 14 High Level Control 1 6,240,000 2,850,000 4,770,000 1,620,000 779,000 2 7,500,000 2,680,000 4,480,000 1,170,000 882,000 3 6,300,000 3,210,000 3,950,000 1,720,000 823,000 avg 6,680,000 2,913,333 4,400,000 1,503,333 828,000 Composition of the present invention 1 22600 9600 51000 14000 11200 2 28500 8200 28000 12300 8400 3 14600 16700 22100 16300 9500 avg 21900 11500 33700 14200 9700 avg % 99.67 99.61 99.23 99.06 08.83 reduction Day 14 Low Level Control 1 55,000 28,000 44,100 33,100 8,400 2 44,000 23,200 46,200 15,000 12,100 3 52,000 29,000 39,000 28,900 7,800 avg 50,333 26,733 43,100 25,667 9,433 Composition of the present invention 1 160 330 180 130 110 2 183 180 106 87 75 3 254 300 200 65 175 avg 199 270 162 94 120 avg % 99.60 98.99 99.62 99.63 98.73 reduction

Example 4

[0092] In an examination of Beef and Chicken at Ameritech Laboratories, the analysis requested was a Microbiology Challenge Study of Listeria and E. Coli.

[0093] Two pieces of meat, Beef and Chicken, of Uniform thickness (approx. ½″) were cut into 1 cm squares, immersed in hot water at 185 deg C. for 2 minutes, and then put in the refrigerator to cool.

[0094] The pieces were divided into 4 sets which were handled in the following manner; set 1—no further treatment, Sets 2, 3 & 4 were immersed in Listeria or E. Coli cultures to coat the pieces with these organisms. Removed, held at room temperature for 6 hours, and then all 4 sets were refrigerated overnight.

[0095] The following morning, the samples were removed from the refrigerator. Set #4 was treated with “Composition of the present invention” according to the usual procedure, following which sets 3 and 4 were washed with warm tap water.

[0096] All sets of both beef and chicken were then analyzed for bacteria counts. TABLE 4 Results: #4 % reduction #1 #2 #3 #4 (#4/#2) × 100 Beef-Listeria 1 ND 1650000 790000 31600 98.1 2 ND 1470000 720000 11400 99.2 3 ND 1870000 970000 21400 98.9 4 ND 1380000 662000 9500 99.3 5 ND 2060000 1160000 24900 98.8 6 ND 1540000 617000 9900 99.4 Beef-E. Coli 1 ND 2700000 670000 19900 99.3 2 ND 2200000 912000 48200 97.8 3 ND 2940000 574000 35200 98.8 4 ND 2030000 294000 31300 98.5 5 ND 3020000 720000 23100 99.2 6 ND 2570000 454000 12400 99.5 Chicken- Listeria 1 ND 1350000 116000 9500 99.3 2 ND 1660000 362000 8700 99.5 3 ND 1920000 268000 16000 99.2 4 ND 1560000 253000 19400 98.8 5 ND 1620000 147000 12700 99.2 6 ND 1770000 247000 8300 99.5 Chicken- E. Coli 1 ND 2910000 389000 27600 99.1 2 ND 2470000 520000 27500 98.9 3 ND 3120000 374000 22400 99.3 4 ND 3040000 242000 16200 99.5 5 ND 2190000 227000 9500 99.6 6 ND 2570000 462000 12000 99.5

Example 5

[0097] The Composition of the present invention was studied as a Surface Cleaner for food preparation surfaces.

[0098] The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Composition of the present invention as a cleaning agent for equipment and structural surfaces.

[0099] The following materials were tested using square, smooth, flat surfaces: aluminum, stainless steel, ceramic tile, glass, porcelain and PVC plastic.

[0100] Stock cultures of the following bacteria were prepared: E. Coli, Salmonella typimurium, Listeria Monocytogenes and Staphylococcus Aureus. These cultures were prepared so as to have approximately 1 million bacteria per milliliter.

[0101] The 2 milliliters of each culture was applied to an area 2 inches square on 9 samples of each surface type. The culture was spread evenly and allowed to dry and then stay overnight.

[0102] The nine samples of each surface type were divided into three groups of three. One group was used as the control group. The second and third group were treated with Composition of the present invention by spraying the material on the surface until 100 percent of the test area was covered. One of these sets was allowed to sit for 15 minutes which was followed by a warm water (approximately 45 deg. C.) spray rinse. The spray rinse was adjusted so as to have a moderate speed and force. The last set of samples was treated the same as the second with the exception at the end of the 15 minute waiting period the surface was scrubbed with moderate force with a brush with moderately stiff bristles prior to the water rinse.

[0103] At the end of the treatments, all three sets of samples were tested for bacteria counts using the swab technique covering the full 2 square inches. TABLE 5 Results: E. Coli Salmon. Listeria Staph. Stainless Steel 1 1240000 1720000 986000 1650000 2 1070000 1310000 1320000 1780000 3 1480000 1560000 1080000 1220000 avg 1263333 1530000 1128667 1550000 4 7920 24200 18600 14500 5 4920 7500 1870 24900 6 12180 12100 17400 9720 avg 8340 14600 12623 16373 avg % reduction 99.340 99.046 98.882 98.944 7 36 24 150 104 8 12 103 131 87 9 89 5 22 17 avg 46 44 101 69 avg % reduction 99.996 99.997 99.991 99.996 Aluminum 1 1042000 1560000 1140000 1820000 2 943000 1720000 1530000 1710000 3 1310000 1840000 1020000 1920000 avg 1098333 1706667 1230000 1816667 4 13500 10500 8430 12700 5 2540 35300 58300 11400 6 11060 18900 11200 6340 avg 9033 21567 25977 10147 avg % reduction 99.178 98.736 97.888 99.441 7 156 0 11 158 8 8 54 5 62 9 67 127 37 19 avg 77 60 18 80 avg % reduction 99.993 99.986 99.999 99.996 Ceramic Tile 1 1540000 1820000 1190000 1370000 2 1260000 1620000 1070000 1450000 3 1420000 1320000 921000 1620000 avg 1406667 1586667 1060333 1480000 4 4920 64500 24500 9760 5 12750 39400 11430 25600 6 31300 11020 6520 31500 avg 16323 38307 14150 22287 avg % reduction 98.840 97.586 98.666 98.494 7 350 17 27 61 8 56 135 91 30 9 16 45 14 87 avg 141 66 44 39 avg % reduction 99.990 99.996 99.996 99.997 Glass 1 1250000 1420000 956000 1690000 2 1430000 1670000 1450000 1570000 3 1230000 1750000 1130000 1830000 avg 1303333 1613333 1178667 1696667 4 37800 9700 6650 17900 5 26500 28300 11400 6970 6 19600 16500 33400 12400 avg 27967 18167 17150 12423 avg % reduction 97.854 98.874 98.545 99.268 7 156 0 11 158 8 8 54 5 62 9 67 127 37 19 avg 77 60 18 80 avg % reduction 99.994 99.996 99.999 99.995 Results: Porcelain 1 1370000 1360000 1140000 1470000 2 1420000 1310000 1100000 1850000 3 1150000 1620000 1240000 1620000 avg 1313333 1430000 1160000 1646667 4 23700 32400 18200 21300 5 13400 54200 13100 10400 6 10300 15300 7400 8300 avg 15800 33967 12900 13333 avg % reduction 99.797 97.625 98.888 99.190 7 247 47 75 104 8 102 0 14 87 9 65 23 165 17 avg 138 23 85 69 avg % reduction 99.989 99.998 99.993 99.996 PVC Plastic 1 1570000 1650000 945000 1570000 2 1640000 1320000 894000 1430000 3 1420000 1720000 1160000 1810000 avg 1543333 1563333 999667 1603333 4 7820 23100 16000 16700 5 44400 69500 10400 42000 6 21300 13700 4320 32800 avg 24507 35433 10240 32800 avg % reduction 98.412 97.733 98.976 97.954 7 76 47 56 95 8 6 0 106 16 9 34 82 122 7 avg 39 43 95 39 avg % reduction 99.997 99.997 99.991 99.998

Example 6

[0104] In further tests by Associated Analytical Laboratories, Inc. of New York, N.Y. a test was made of a sample of the composition of the present invention as an all natural anti-bacterial Marinade to reduce E. Coli & Salmonella by over 95%.

[0105] Batch #C99175-3 21:13—made in Canada

[0106] Test: verify claimed effectiveness.

[0107] Reference Procedures: Official Methods of Analysis of A.O.A.C. International, 16^(th) Ed, A.O.A.C. method 960.09

[0108] Cultures used for Exposure: Escherichia Coli, ATCC #11229 Salmonella Cholerasuis, ATCC #98-12 TABLE 6 REPORT OF FINDINGS E. Coli Salmonella INITIAL BACTERIA COUNT/ml 5.13 × 10 ninth 4.49 × 10 ninth BACTERIA COUNT/ml, 1.48 × 10 eighth 1.44 × 10 eighth after 5 minute exposure % REDUCTION after 5 minute 97.1150% 96.7929% exposure CULTURES ALLOWED TO AIR DRY @ 35 DEG C. PRIOR TO REEXAMINATION BACTERIA COUNT/ml after 7 7.54 × 10 seventh 5.94 × 10 seventh day exposure % REDUCTION after 7 day 99.1150% 98.6771% exposure NUMBER CONTROL 5.13 × 10 ninth 4.46 × 10 ninth INTERPRETATION: EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE

Example 7

[0109] In another test by Associated Analytical Laboratories, Inc. a sample of the composition of the present invention was tested as an all natural anti-bacterial Marinade said to reduce numbers of pathogenic bacteria:

[0110] Batch #C99175-3 21:13—made in Canada

[0111] Test: verify claimed effectiveness.

[0112] Reference Procedures: Official Methods of Analysis of A.O.A.C. International, 16^(th) Ed, A.O.A.C. method 960.09

[0113] Cultures used for Exposure: STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS, ATCC 6538 CAMPYLOBACTER, JEJUNI, ATCC 33560 TABLE 7 REPORT OF FINDINGS STAPHYLO- CAMPYLO- COCCUS BACTER INITIAL BACTERIA COUNT/ml 5.03 × 10 ninth 3.33 × 10 ninth BACTERIA COUNT/ml, 3.33 × 10 eighth 1.08 × 10 ninth after 5 minute exposure % REDUCTION after 5 minute 93.3797% 67.5676% exposure CULTURES ALLOWED TO AIR DRY @ 35 DEG C. PRIOR TO REEXAMINATION BACTERIA COUNT/ml after 7 1.60 × 10 ninth 8.87 × 10 eighth day exposure % REDUCTION after 7 day 96.8191% 73.3634% exposure NUMBER CONTROL 5.02 × 10 ninth 3.32 × 10 ninth INTERPRETATION: EFFECTIVE @ EFFECTIVE @ >96% >73%

Example 8

[0114] In yet another test by Associated Analytical Laboratories, Inc., a sample of the composition of the present invention was made as an all natural anti-bacterial Marinade said to reduce numbers of pathogenic bacteria.

[0115] Batch #C99175-3 21:13—made in Canada

[0116] Test: verify claimed effectiveness.

[0117] Reference Procedures: Official Methods of Analysis of A.O.A.C. International, 16^(th) Ed, A.O.A.C. method 960.09

[0118] Cultures used for Exposure: CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS, ATCC 3624 YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA, ATCC 55075 TABLE 8 REPORT OF FINDINGS CLOSTRIDIUM YERSINIA INITIAL BACTERIA COUNT/ml 5.26 × 10 ninth 3.61 × 10 ninth BACTERIA COUNT/ml, 5.98 × 10 eighth 6.20 × 10 eighth after 5 minute exposure % REDUCTION after 5 minute 88.6312% 82.8255% exposure CULTURES ALLOWED TO AIR DRY @ 35 DEG C. PRIOR TO REEXAMINATION BACTERIA COUNT/ml after 7 2.944 × 10 eighth 4.09 × 10 eighth day exposure % REDUCTION after 7 day 94.4106% 88.6704% exposure NUMBER CONTROL 5.25 × 10 ninth 3.62 × 10 ninth INTERPRETATION: EFFECTIVE @ EFFECTIVE @ >94% >88%

Example 9

[0119] In another example, a test by Associated Anaylitical Laboratories studied Batch #C99175-3 21:13, which was made in Canada to verify claimed effectiveness against Listeria Monocytogenes, ATCC 4428 and Vibrio Cholerae, ATCC 582.

[0120] Reference Procedures: Official Methods of Analysis of A.O.A.C. International, 16^(th) Ed, A.O.A.C. method 960.09

[0121] Cultures used for Exposure: LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES, ATC 4428 VIBRIO CHOLERAE, ATCC 582 TABLE 9 REPORT OF FINDINGS LISTERIA VIBRIO INITIAL BACTERIA COUNT/ml 1.61 × 10 ninth 3.98 × 10 ninth BACTERIA COUNT/ml, 4.04 × 10 eighth 1.21 × 10 ninth after 5 minute exposure % REDUCTION after 5 minute 74.9068% 69.5980% exposure CULTURES ALLOWED TO AIR DRY @ 35 DEG C. PRIOR TO REEXAMINATION BACTERIA COUNT/ml after 7 6.82 × 10 seventh 5.35 × 10 eighth day exposure % REDUCTION after 7 day 95.7640% 88.5578% exposure NUMBER CONTROL 1.60 × 10 ninth 3.99 × 10 ninth INTERPRETATION: EFFECTIVE @ EFFECTIVE @ >95% >88%

[0122] The above results clearly point to the efficacy of the present invention in reducing the bacteria count of food samples treated therewith. The results are properly characterized as consistent and dramatic in reducing bacteria on food to be cooked.

[0123] While a preferred embodiment of the invention has been described and shown, it is to be clearly understood that the same is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims. 

I claim:
 1. A composition suitable for cleaning and disinfecting products comprising an aqueous mixture of at least about 32% by volume of water, from about 4 to 27% by volume of a 5% vinegar solution, from about 14 to 31% by volume of lemon juice, from about 14 to 31% by volume of lime juice, from about 1 to 5 teaspoons/gallon of salt and from about 1 to 5 teaspoons/gallon of tumeric.
 2. The composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein said aqueous composition contains at least 0.2% by volume of vinegar.
 3. The composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein said lemon juice is fresh squeezed fruit juice and said lime juice is fresh squeezed fruit juice.
 4. The composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein said composition contains about 50% by volume of water, about 8% by volume of 5% white vinegar, about 21% by volume of fresh squeezed lemon juice and about 21% by volume of fresh squeezed lime juice.
 5. A process for cleaning and disinfecting eviscerated and descaled raw seafood, comprising: a) providing an eviscerated and descaled raw seafood sample to be treated; b) immersing said raw seafood sample in a treatment bath comprised of a composition as claimed in claim 1 for a period of time sufficient to clean, deodorize and disinfect the raw seafood sample without adversely affecting the texture thereof, said immersion step including a period of at least 30 seconds of vigorous agitation before removing the seafood sample from the treatment bath; and c) removing the seafood sample from the treatment bath and washing the same with water.
 6. The process as claimed in claim 5, wherein said raw seafood sample is a fresh fish sample.
 7. The process as claimed in claim 6, wherein said seafood sample is immersed in said treatment bath for from 4 to 8 minutes.
 8. A process for disinfecting raw food products in preparation for consumer display and/or cooking, a) providing a raw food products ample to be treated; b) immersing said raw food product sample in a treatment bath comprised of a treatment composition as claimed in claim 1 for a period of time sufficient to reduce the bacterial count thereof without adversely affecting the texture and appearance thereof, said immersion step including a period of vigorous agitation sufficient to remove undesirable oils and waste products from the surface thereof before removing the food product from the treatment bath; and c) removing the food product sample from the treatment bath.
 9. The process as claimed in claim 8, wherein said food product is immersed in said treatment bath from 4 to 8 minutes.
 10. The process as claimed in claim 8, wherein said food products is selected from raw meat, raw fowl and raw seafood.
 11. The process as claimed in claim 8, wherein said food product is a fresh, raw food product.
 12. The composition suitable for cleaning and disinfecting a product as in claim 1 wherein said components are provided in amounts about according to the following formula: amt/1000 ml amt/gal amt/gal Ingredient SS SS 8 fold Conc Lemon juice (1 + 7) 26.4 ml 100.0 ml 800.0 Lime juice (1 + 6.5) 26.4 ml 100.0 ml 800.0 White Vinegar, 15% 26.4 ml 100.0 ml 266.7 Salt 4.0 gm 15 gm 120.0 Tumeric 2.6 ml 10 ml 1718.3 Total 1000.0 ml 3785.0 ml 3785.0


13. A process of using the formula to as in claim 12 comprising the steps of exposing and applying the composition to a raw food product.
 14. The process as in claim 13 wherein the step of exposing and applying the composition is by exposing ground meat to an ice blend containing the composition of the in frozen form.
 15. The process as in claim 13 wherein the step of exposing and applying the composition is by rinsing the product with the composition.
 16. The process as in claim 13 wherein the step of exposing and applying the composition is by spraying the product with the composition.
 17. The process as in claim 13 wherein the step of exposing and applying the composition is by exposing steaming the product with the composition.
 18. The process as in claim 13 wherein the product is fish.
 19. The process as in claim 13 wherein the product is seafood.
 20. The process as in claim 13 wherein the product is beef.
 21. The process as in claim 13 wherein the product is poultry.
 22. The process as in claim 13 wherein the product is a tubular formed meat.
 23. The process as in claim 13 wherein the product is produce.
 24. A process of using the formula to as in claim 12 comprising the steps of exposing and applying the composition to a food preparation surface.
 25. A process of using the formula to as in claim 12 comprising the steps of exposing and applying the composition to a food preparation machine.
 26. A process of using the formula to as in claim 12 comprising the steps of exposing and applying the composition to a livestock feed.
 27. A process of using the formula to as in claim 12 comprising the steps of exposing and applying the composition to an orifice of a livestock. 